There’s a moment at conferences that always makes me shift in my seat.

It’s not the talk.
It’s the introduction.

The chairperson steps up, clears their throat, and begins reading a bio the speaker has… generously prepared for them.

Then it starts.

Titles, awards, committees, fellowships, affiliations, achievements…
A slow march through every accomplishment since Year 10.

The audience listens politely, the way you listen to someone else’s dream: supportive, but not entirely sure what’s going on.

And something subtle happens in the room.
Instead of warming up, the connection thins.
Not because the speaker isn’t impressive — they often are — but because the introduction is doing too much work.

Everyone recognises the subtext:
​Please trust me. Please believe I deserve to be here.

But the irony is that the more you try to prove your credibility upfront, the less the audience feels it.

​

​

💡 ONE IDEA WELL

Here’s the quiet truth at the heart of all this:

If your talk needs your introduction to prove your credibility, something’s off.

Your authority should emerge naturally — from clarity, relevance, and the way you hold the room — not from a verbal trophy cabinet.

This isn’t just feel-good philosophy. There’s real psychology behind it.

​

1. The Pratfall Effect (Aronson, 1966)​
People trust speakers more when they seem human, not untouchable.
Over-polished introductions create distance, not trust.

​

2. Self-promotion backfires (Rudman, 1998)​
When someone lists their achievements too aggressively, audiences subconsciously push back.
It feels like a sales pitch.
​

3. Warmth before competence (Cuddy, Fiske, Glick, 2008)​
Audiences connect first with warmth — story, relevance, humanness.
Competence is accepted afterwards, not before.
​

Put simply:
An introduction that tries to do the heavy lifting for you often does the opposite.

It’s like turning up to a first date with a list of reasons why you’re the one.
It doesn’t strengthen the connection — it squeezes it.

🧰 LESS MESS, MORE MESSAGE

A good introduction should do one thing:

Clear a path for the message.

Not list job titles.
Not recite a CV.
Not rehearse a lifetime of achievements.

Just answer three questions:

Why this topic?​
​Why now?​
​Why this speaker cares about it?

That’s enough for the audience to lean in.

And when someone else is introducing you?
Give them something short, warm, and human.

A sentence or two about the problem you’re solving, not the accolades you’ve collected.

Let the talk earn the trust.
Let the message reveal the credibility.

It always does.

​

🖋️ TRY THIS

For your next talk, write your introduction like this:

1. Begin with the problem or question you’re speaking into.​
Make it about the topic, not your trophies.

2. Add one line about why you’re connected to it.​
The thread, not the whole tapestry.

3. Stop.​
If the audience needs more, your talk will give it to them.

🧭 ASK YOURSELF THIS

​
​
Speak soon,

Andy

PS If your next talk needs a tune-up — slides, story, or structure — reply and I’ll share how I work with people 1:1.