I’m giving the first talk of the day soon.
08:35. A general audience. Coffee not quite doing its job yet.

It’s meant to be about common ENT presentations in children.
Things that are better out than in ears, noses, or throats.

But I’m not starting with the anatomy.
I’m starting with the approach.

Because first thing in the morning, people don’t need a data dump. They need orientation. And that’s not a failing of motivation or preparation.

It’s biology.

Early in the day, attention is still warming up. Add a room full of strangers, unfamiliar expectations, and the low-grade stress of not wanting to look foolish, and cognitive bandwidth disappears quickly.

That’s the state many children arrive in before we’ve even said hello.

Foreign bodies look simple—right up until they aren’t.

💡 ONE IDEA WELL

The first attempt is often the only one that really matters

Foreign bodies are deceptively good teachers.

A bead in a nose.
A seed in an ear.
A coin that might have been swallowed.

On paper, these are straightforward problems. In the room, they rarely are.

Foreign bodies have a particular property: the first attempt shapes everything that follows.

Before the first try, the child is curious.
After it, they’re guarded.

Before the first try, the parent is hopeful.
After it, they’re anxious.

Before the first try, the clinician is calm.
After it, there’s pressure—to finish, to succeed, to justify what’s already been started.

The system tightens.

That’s why the first attempt is often the best attempt.
And sometimes, the only one that really counts.
​
​

This is where paediatric ENT and public speaking quietly overlap.

​

The first minutes of a talk behave exactly like the first attempt at an examination.

Before you begin, the room is open. People are curious. They’re scanning you, not judging you.
Once you begin, everything changes.

Attention narrows. Stakes rise. People start deciding whether they’re safe here—safe to listen, safe to not understand everything, safe to stay engaged.

That’s why the first few minutes of a presentation do so much hidden work.

If you start dense, people don’t lean in—they brace.
If you start fast, they don’t catch up—they fall behind quietly.
If you start by proving how much you know, you spend trust before you’ve earned it.

Just like with children, the audience doesn’t need everything at once. They need orientation. They need to know where they are, what’s expected of them, and whether they’re allowed to relax.

That’s why I’m starting this talk the way I am.
Not with content. With context.

Because in speaking—as in paediatrics—the first attempt shapes everything that follows.

🧰 LESS MESS, MORE MESSAGE

Approach decides whether technique gets a chance

What determines success in paediatric ENT usually isn’t dexterity. It’s everything that happens before the examination even begins.

How you enter the room.
Where the child is sitting.
How quickly you move.
Whether you rush to “just have a look.”
Whether you’ve quietly decided that success means getting it done.

The same is true when you’re standing at the front of a room.

How you begin.
How quickly you speak.
Whether you orient people or overwhelm them.
Whether you start by proving expertise or by earning trust.

Children don’t resist examinations. They respond to uncertainty. To speed. To adults whose nervous systems look busy.

Audiences do exactly the same.

Medicine—and teaching—tend to reward persistence. We admire grit. We admire the extra try. The slide you push through. The point you insist on making.

But there’s a point where persistence becomes harm.

A partial exam in a calm child often gives you more information than a complete exam in a distressed one. A shorter, simpler opening often does more work than a perfect one delivered too fast.

Knowing when to stop isn’t a failure of skill.

It is the skill.

🧭 ASK YOURSELF THIS

Before your next “simple” encounter, pause for five seconds and ask yourself:

Sometimes the most competent move is choosing not to escalate the system at all.

​
​
Speak soon,

Andy